Previous Entry | Next Entry

Dear LAURA VARKER, of Phoenix, AZ...

  • Jan. 24th, 2008 at 6:58 AM
KHAAAN!
YOU BELONG IN A CAGE FOR DRUNK DRIVING AND MANSLAUGHTER, YOU OVER-PRIVILEGED, ENTITLED BIMBO!!!

Guess who's facing 21 years in prison — the drunk , rich, white one, or the sober, poor, black one?
Two cars collided last year on Cinco de Mayo.

Considering the date, you might assume that at least one of the drivers was drunk — and you'd be right. Laura Varker was 17 years old, and she'd been tubing down the Salt River all day with her eight best girlfriends. Their T-shirts all read "Cinco de Drinko." Even an hour after the accident, Varker's blood-alcohol level was 0.09, over the legal limit for adults. And, as an underage driver, she was in violation of the law by having any amount of alcohol in her system.

One of Varker's girlfriends, 15-year-old Felicia Edwards, didn't drink a drop*. But it was Edwards who died when Varker's Yukon Denali hit another car and flipped over and over like a tumbleweed before coming to a horrifying stop on the Bush Highway north of Mesa. Edwards was thrown from the SUV and pronounced dead at the scene.

When sheriff's deputies called Felicia's mother that terrible day, her first question was, "Was she wearing a seat belt?" She wasn't. Instead, Felicia had been in the back of the SUV holding down the tubes — a decision she paid for with her life.

That's a tragedy.

But only in its aftermath did the collision become a travesty. That's because, even after blood tests showed that Varker was legally drunk, and even after sheriff's investigators learned that it was she and another girl who'd flashed a fake ID and bought Coors Light and malt liquor for the group, Varker hasn't been charged with anything.

Not underage consumption.

Not drunken driving.

And certainly not manslaughter.

Instead of charging the affluent white girl, the sheriff's officers arrested the other driver, a black man, a guy who wasn't even legally drunk.

Bryant Wilkerson was a 28-year-old postal service clerk with nothing on his record worse than a fender-bender. That day, he was merely making a U-turn, in a place where U-turns are permitted, when a 17-year-old party girl in her daddy's SUV tried to speed around him.

Wilkerson's life has been upended. He's been charged with nine felony counts, including manslaughter and aggravated assault. He spent three months in jail because he didn't have the money to post bail, and he lost his job because of that. Now under strict curfew and random alcohol and drug screenings for the past five months, he has to get permission from the court just to attend his daughter's band concerts in the evening.

He's facing 21 years in prison...
The article goes on to point out that Wilkerson should probably take the hit for freaking out and leaving the scene of an accident. Fine.

But the drunken, underage white-girl who uses her daddy's SUV TO KILL HER FRIEND is is all lawyered up and posting to her MySpace page while her friend is rotting in the ground and the sober, brown-skinned working-guy with a daughter making the legal U-Turn is facing 21 years?

Fucking worthless, sack-o-shit, terrorist-loving SUV drivers. It's bad enough that they hate America and want our troops to bleed and die half way around the globe. Chalk up one more dead, mangled innocent on their slate.

Remind me NEVER to go to Arizona for any reason. The jungle-half of my genes are a bit melanin-laced, and the amount of sun down there would only make it worse.**

Via [info]the_urban_monk (although with a monk-like lack of vitriol).
* Studies show that it's the non-drinkers who suffer the worst in car accident because they tense up for the hit while the drunks remain loose and fluid.

The lesson seems to be "Don't get into a car as a passenger if you're sober".

** OTOH, the most menacing "Leave this bar, or we will beat your café-au-lait ass down" gaze I ever got was in Lynn, MA, outside Boston. But that's what one gets for going into a local corner bar in a town you're not familiar with.

Fuck it, maybe just don't leave Northern California. I know what neighborhoods and bars to avoid 'round here in the Bay Area.
The Long Yuletide War: A short-story cycle

Comments

[info]monica_lisa wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 04:39 pm (UTC)
Oh man, I was already in a simmering pissed-off mood this morning. Now my blood pressure is peaking. Man. Is there anything one can do? Maybe send some money to a legal defense fund for him or something?
[info]spiritualmonkey wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 05:56 pm (UTC)
None that I'm aware of, but I'll let you know if I see one.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jul. 24th, 2008 11:33 pm (UTC)
this article is bullshit ... the truth will come out about what really happend once bryant wilkerson goes to trial.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jul. 5th, 2009 07:19 pm (UTC)
Good call genius. The article was 100% right on point.
[info]gwenzilla wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 05:47 pm (UTC)
The level of editorializing in that article is scary.
[info]spiritualmonkey wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 05:55 pm (UTC)
Well, it's someone's column, not a front-page news item. Those tend to be somewhat opinionated.

Do you feel it distorts the facts, or is just editorializing in general you don't like?
[info]gwenzilla wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 06:24 pm (UTC)
I don't know the facts so I can't tell you if it distorts them or not. I don't like editorializing in general in news [even in the editorials] when it's inflammatory rather than fervent.

I'm not saying this piece isn't right on in calling out the seemingly disproportionate treatment of the two drivers, especially in Arizona, home of the shady, but the daddy's rich bitch idiot teen/POOR MR. WILKERSON stuff is way over the top, especially in a case where [buried down the page]
- Wilkerson fled the scene [obviously someone was hurt as the deceased had flown out of the car]
- says he initially thought the accident was his fault
- by the time he was tracked down *still* blew a .049
- admitted to having smoked pot earlier.
IMO not the most reliable driver or witness.

AND I am really not cool on naming minors as suspect [see recent initial suspects in the Alameda murder, several of whom were cleared as mistakes but not until after being identified widely in press], particularly ones who haven't been charged with anything [regardless of whether they should], and am grossed out by the demonizing irrelevant crap [of course she's on MySpace in a bikini -- she's 17], etc.

Bryant Wilkerson was a 28-year-old postal service clerk with nothing on his record worse than a fender-bender.
vs.
Just seven months earlier, as a 16-year-old with a brand-new license, Varker had caused another accident...[fender-bender].

At least one witness, a friend of Varker's who was just behind her on the highway, told deputies that [Wilkerson's] car was slowing too dramatically for her to stop; Varker had to lurch into the center lane just to avoid rear-ending him.

Varker's friends: "Their T-shirts all read 'Cinco de Drinko.'"
Wilkerson's friends: "But I had the people in my car yelling, 'Go, go, go!'"

etc. etc. etc.
[info]spiritualmonkey wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 07:09 pm (UTC)
- Wilkerson fled the scene [obviously someone was hurt as the deceased had flown out of the car]

He should definitely take the hit for fleeing the scene of an accident.

Whether or not he saw & registered that a passenger was ejected, I would contend, is not automatically obvious. Eyewitness testimony in general is not all that reliable when compared to circumstantial evidence (although we as a society tend to think it's the other way around).

- says he initially thought the accident was his fault

I've been on scene as a first responder at a couple of car accident. Someone whose car has just been impacted is not usually a good judge of what's happened. Adrenaline pumped into your system under fight-or-flight conditions is powerful stuff.

- by the time he was tracked down *still* blew a .049

That was 10 minutes after the accident. Unless he's some physiological freak with a metabolism outside the normal human range, that means he was almost certainly well under the legal limit at the time of the accident.

- admitted to having smoked pot earlier.
I'm not particularly concerned about the effects of smoking pot earlier that morning on his driving, given the research that's been done. I think the alcohol is a MUCH more dangerous chemical to have in your bloodstream when driving. And even then, he was well under the legal limit for how much AZ will allow you to have in your bloodstream ands till drive.

IMO not the most reliable driver or witness.

With a good lawyer, I'd bet he'll make a much more sympathetic witness than the drunken teen behind the wheel of daddy's SUV.

Unlike those youths charged in Alameda, no one contests the facts that:
-She was behind the wheel of the car that crashed and killed her friend
-She was underage AND over the limit for legal drinkers. She broke the law by having ANY alcohol in her system before she even thought about getting behind the wheel.

I would argue that there is a prima facie case as described to arrest someone on multiple charges relating to the death. Let the courts handle it.

If daddy's sodden little rich bitch the drunken minor behind the wheel in question couldn't slow down fast enough, then she was following too closely for the speed she was traveling.

It's the following car's responsibility, just ask your insurance broker.

Personally, I have little to no problem with the inflammatory nature of the column. I think there are not enough flames under the sheriff's ass to lock young miss Varker in a cage, and I hope this piece helps stoke some anger and resentment.

It's a travesty of justice that DLRB is free to post any sort of pictures to her MySpace page.

IMHO, She belongs in a cage, and I have little to no problem with people calling for it (and her) by name.
[info]cartman94501 wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 07:58 pm (UTC)
Would you feel the same way if she was equally drunk and irresponsible but poor and/or an ethnic minority? I know I would.
[info]spiritualmonkey wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 08:08 pm (UTC)
If being such was what seemed to be the deciding factor in her getting off scot-free, I would too. I just wouldn't be piling-on with the class warfare angle.

Her being a rich, entitled, daddy's little bimbo in a fucking terrorist-loving SUV merely makes it galling, as well as typical

Edited at 2008-01-24 08:09 pm (UTC)
[info]cartman94501 wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 08:22 pm (UTC)

I am always skeptical about people offering opinions in criminal matters that haven't been to trial. When people ask me, "Do you think so-and-so should be convicted?" I always respond, "Yes, if he/she is guilty, and no if not." It drives people mad!

As a nerd with an obsession for fairness and weak social intuition, I wish I lived in a society where the same rules applied to everyone, and everyone knew what they were. I can't remember how many times I saw people blithely ignoring rules, so I did the same, only to find out that I ignored one too many and got busted (or ostracized, or whatever) for it.

I get away with speeding in Alameda all the time because I keep it under 30 (the speed limit is 25). By doing this for eight years, I've managed to stay ticket-free in a notorious speed trap of a town. But I wonder how much of this is because I'm a middle-aged cracker driving a nice-looking car. When I was an almost-middle-aged cracker driving an old, dented car, I still got away with it, so who knows? The cops can't be everywhere at all times, and my normal route to and from work keeps me away from the most heavily policed areas (not on purpose), but who knows. When I drive 25, people tailgate me mercilessly. To a nerd, speed limit means "Never drive any faster than that, and if you accidentally creep over it, slow down as soon as you can, to that speed or lower." But to most people, it means "You'd better drive at least that fast and preferably a fair bit faster, or I'm going to ride your ass so close I should put on a condom."

I feel conflicted because I tend to get away with things that other people don't because I'm white, male, heterosexual, and reasonably well-off. Do I want to stop getting away with those things, maybe take a few cop beatings? Hell no! I wish the cops wouldn't beat anyone, but if there are going to be n cop beatings per year, and there's nothing anyone can do about it, I'm glad that .999n are going to people who don't look like me. Does that make me a bastard? I suppose it wouldn't be the only thing...

(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 25th, 2008 04:19 pm (UTC)
Laura Varker absolutely deserves to be charged for underage drinking and manslaughter. She has learned nothing from this experience and still drinks and parties all of the time. She's a stuck up bitch who gets away with everything because mommy and daddy are rich
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 25th, 2008 05:05 pm (UTC)
What?
It does not matter what his condition was, or his state of mind under these facts.

Assuming these facts are true, the point of the article and the core "issue" is the disparity of justice. no matter what you think of him, if you think the situation is being treated fairly and she is appropriately left out (no charges) then I feel for you when injustice visits you.

(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 10:35 pm (UTC)
Myspace page
Where's the link to her myspace page? It would be nice to leave comments there...
[info]spiritualmonkey wrote:
Jan. 24th, 2008 11:00 pm (UTC)
Re: Myspace page
Couldn't identify it. She must be smart enough to not list it under her real name, what with killing her friend while drunk and all.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 25th, 2008 03:12 pm (UTC)
Re: Myspace page
the myspace page of a Laura Varker in a bikini is actually from a 20-year-old girl in Hungary.

she's real real hot and all, but it's not the Laura Varker in question. it appears that her myspace page has been cleaned out of pictures, friends and all information (probably under her lawyer's advisement).
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 25th, 2008 11:15 pm (UTC)
Re: Myspace page
actually, if you read the comments, they are all talking about ASU and school.... they defidently are from AZ.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 08:24 pm (UTC)
Re: Myspace page
It fooled me for a min, until I noticed a blog titled Felicia. And the comments. Yeah, she's hiding
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 25th, 2008 01:38 am (UTC)
It's bogus.
Google for "laura varker" or "bryant wilkerson" and there's nothing else other than this story, other than 500 robotic blogspots. The myspace was inactive since early 06 until 3 days ago, and now the top 5 are arab bands.

Nothing to see here... Sorry, it's the internet at work.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Feb. 24th, 2008 03:19 am (UTC)
I got Laura Varker suspended from our high school.
I had math class this year with Laura Varker. She was the teacher's aid and would make copies of the test answer keys and sell them to people in our class. Everytime we'd take a test I'd look around and she'd basically be passing out the answers to kids who then readily supplied her with money.

I couldn't really stand the fact that I was working my butt off in that class and get lower grades than everyone who was cheating.

So one day I went into the assistant principals office and reported her. She is currently suspended and our math teacher is pushing for her to get expelled.

Gee, what a nice girl. As if killing someone wasn't enough to learn a lesson...she had to start her own high schol black market. Luckily I made sure it was stopped.

Thought you'd all like to hear that : )
[info]e_mata wrote:
Jul. 18th, 2008 01:08 am (UTC)
Re: I got Laura Varker suspended from our high school.
Wow, you were upset because you were working your butt off in a lower-level math class? Intersting.. perhaps you should've gone for a class suitable to your knowledge?. You talk as if you have never cheated before; You know very well that your teacher didn't care at all about the subject he taught becuase he was a football coach with knowledge in mathematics. Every student tried switching into his class becuase he was a push-over and let anyone cheat. Still, it is nice to see that you derive your happines and successes from everyone else's troubles, faults and/or mistkaes. Quite the respectful person you are! Good thing you posted this comment annonymously.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jun. 3rd, 2008 10:13 pm (UTC)
Use to know this girl
Use to go to middle school with her back in the day. She was a slut since 7th grade. She lost her virginity since 7th grade I think, maybe earlier. But when I first knew her I know she would be trouble. Looking back at it and I am not surprise she would do something like this. Sigh.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2008 08:27 am (UTC)
I'M DISGUSTED!!!!
I'm so disgusted at the way this being treated! O.k I understand that Bryant left the scene of the accident, but to charge him for manslaughter?? What the fuck??
Laura- bought beer with a fake ID, was driving while intoxicated,
lied to a deputy....oh yeah and killed one of her friends and she is going unpunished?? That makes me sick! Her and her parents should be punished. They allow her to think that money can get you off the hook! What about the family who lost Felicia, where's their closure? She should be locked up and take responsibilty for her actions! Her parents should be locked up for being fuckin stupid!!! Ugh...this can make you have a fuckin heart attack!!
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 10th, 2009 08:20 pm (UTC)
Latest news: Bryant Wilkerson was acquitted of all but the charge of fleeing the scene.

Team LexiMonkey Household Cookbook

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner